Where employees, rather than the employer as such, discriminate against an employee, the employer may be held vicariously liable for that discrimination, whether or not the discrimination took place with the employer’s knowledge or approval. It is a defence for the employer to show it took all reasonable steps to prevent the employee from doing that act.
A recent case is a reminder to employers on the steps they should put in place to reduce the risk that they may be held vicariously liable (through their own negligence or omission) for an individual employee’s discriminatory act in the workplace.
In that case, the employment tribunal ordered a manager to pay over £1,300 to each of two staff members as compensation for injury to feelings after he was found to have made an allegedly racist comment to a colleague, having concluded that he was personally liable for the racial harassment.
However, the employer (who was also a respondent in the claim) was found to have taken all reasonable steps to prevent this incident, and was therefore not liable for any act of unlawful harassment. The tribunal ruled that not only did the employer have comprehensive policies in place, but it communicated them to their staff, trained all employees on them, and updated that training annually. On this basis it found the employer was not liable for the act of unlawful racial harassment by their manager, as it had taken reasonable steps to prevent it.
This case highlights the need for employers to have a clear policy and training in place for employees and managers setting out how employers will address and take steps to prevent unlawful discrimination occurring in the workplace. Where an employer can show that they took reasonable steps to prevent discrimination from occurring, it is less likely that an employer will be held liable for acts of discrimination by their employees.
The case also underlines that named individuals in a discrimination claim can still be held personally liable for discrimination even if the claims are not upheld against the employer.
At Markel Law we regularly comment on SME related matters.
Follow this link to find out more about Markel Law and how we can assist your business.
[the employer] was cleared of any liability, as the company was able to prove “it took all reasonable steps to prevent” the act and therefore was not liable for it and any damages.